Webgility Pricing 2026 vs A2X Pricing With Plans, Order Caps and What Each One Really Costs

The short answer: A2X and Webgility both push ecommerce orders into QuickBooks or Xero, but they charge on opposite axes and that is what decides the bill. A2X charges per sales channel, from US$29 a month each, and climbs with order volume inside every channel you connect. Webgility charges one plan price with a hard order cap and a channel count baked in, from $69 a month billed annually for 300 orders and 2 channels. A2X is the cleaner fit for a seller on one or two channels who wants summarized payout entries. Webgility is the better fit for multichannel retail, especially anyone on QuickBooks Enterprise, which A2X does not support. One thing changed in September 2026 and most comparisons have not caught up: Webgility's Complete tier now sells bank, credit card and payout reconciliation, but as a monthly service performed by an accounting partner rather than as matching software.

Every price, order cap, channel limit and add-on below was read off each vendor's own pricing page on September 8, 2026. Webgility restructured its plans between our August and September reads, so treat any guide older than this one as out of date, and check the live page before you commit.

A2X vs Webgility at a glance

How much does A2X cost?

A2X publishes a starting price of US$29 per month for Amazon, Shopify, Etsy, eBay and PayPal, and US$79 for Walmart. That figure is per sales channel, and inside each channel the price climbs in tiers as your monthly order count rises. Two multipliers run at once: connect a second storefront and you start a second ladder, grow inside a storefront and you move up the one you are on. Every channel ladder, up to 250,000 orders, is laid out in our full A2X pricing breakdown.

This is the part sellers most often get wrong when budgeting. The headline is a single-channel, low-volume number. If you sell on Shopify, Amazon and eBay, you are looking at three subscriptions, each priced at that channel's own peak monthly order volume. Work out your busiest month per channel, price each ladder separately, then add them up. That total is what you should carry into any comparison.

A2X does offer a free trial, so you can confirm which tier your real volume lands in before committing. Use a busy month rather than a quiet one.

How much does Webgility cost?

Webgility now publishes three separate ladders, one per accounting system, and the plan names no longer line up across them. Read the tab that matches your ledger, because the same plan name means different order caps in different tabs.

QuickBooks Online and Xero

QuickBooks Enterprise

Intuit Enterprise Suite

Annual billing saves roughly 15 percent, and Webgility states the saving per plan: $120 a year on Pro, $240 on Advanced, $600 on Complete for QuickBooks Online, and $1,800 on the $599 Complete tiers.

What are Webgility's hidden costs?

The plan price is not the bill. Six line items sit outside the ladder and they add up faster than a tier upgrade does.

The two overage lines are worth pausing on, because they are not the same rate and Webgility publishes both. The plan cards say extra orders cost $10 a month per 500. The plan comparison table further down lists a backend overage of $50 a month per 100 extra orders. That is a twenty-five times difference per order, so ask which one applies to your account and get the answer in writing. Every plan also includes only three months of historical data, which matters if you are migrating mid-year and want the prior period in the same system.

Which one is cheaper for your business?

Neither, until you describe the business. The crossover is driven by channel count far more than by order volume, because that is the axis the two vendors disagree about.

• One channel, any volume. A2X almost always wins. You pay one ladder, and Webgility's entry plan is charging you for a second channel you are not using.
• Two channels, low to moderate volume. Close. Two A2X connectors start around US$58 combined against Webgility Pro at $69 annually, and the winner flips as soon as either channel climbs a volume tier.
• Three or more channels. Webgility's shape usually costs less. Every channel you add to A2X starts a fresh subscription, while Webgility folds three channels into Complete and five into the QuickBooks Enterprise Complete tier. Past that, extra channels are $20 a month each rather than a whole new ladder.
• QuickBooks Enterprise or Desktop. Not a price question at all. A2X supports QuickBooks Online, Xero and NetSuite only, so Webgility is the only one of the two in the running.
• Seasonal spikes. The two behave differently and this is worth modeling. A November spike moves you up an A2X tier per channel. On Webgility it shows up as overage billing, and the rate decides whether that is cheap or brutal: $10 per 500 extra orders is absorbable, $50 per 100 is not.

What does Webgility do that A2X does not?

Four things now. Webgility syncs inventory and pricing between your storefronts and QuickBooks, so stock levels and price changes propagate rather than being reconciled after the fact. It supports QuickBooks Enterprise and the Intuit Enterprise Suite, which still run a great deal of established multichannel retail and which A2X does not connect to. It supports WooCommerce, which is not on A2X's published channel list. And as of its September 2026 repackaging it sells a bookkeeping outcome on the Complete tier, not just a sync, which is a different kind of product and worth understanding before you compare the prices.

The inventory sync is the one people most often misread. Keeping stock counts aligned across channels is not the same as knowing what to reorder, and neither tool does the second one. Webgility will tell you that you sold 40 units on Amazon and adjust the count. Deciding how many to buy next is still a forecasting job, and a general ledger is a poor place to read demand from.

What does A2X do that Webgility does not?

A2X is more opinionated about the ledger, and accountants tend to prefer it for exactly that reason. Every payout becomes one summarized journal entry, already split across sales, fees, refunds and tax accounts, whose net equals the deposit landing in the bank. The ledger stays small, and every figure traces back to a specific settlement document. If your books are kept by an outside accountant, that is a real gift: there is far less to unpick at month end.

A2X also connects to NetSuite, which Webgility's published ladder does not cover. Checked September 8, 2026, every channel card on a2xaccounting.com offers QuickBooks Online, Xero or NetSuite. For a seller who has outgrown QuickBooks and moved to NetSuite, that narrows the choice to one immediately.

Does A2X or Webgility do bank reconciliation?

A2X does not. Webgility's answer changed in September 2026 and the change is easy to misread, so here is the precise version. Webgility's Complete tier now lists bank account reconciliation, credit card reconciliation, payout and settlement reconciliation, customer statement reconciliation, channel settlement reconciliation and AR subledger reconciliation to the general ledger. Read the rest of the tier and what those items sit next to is a guaranteed monthly ecommerce reconciliation, a monthly accountant review, a books diagnostic report and a dedicated customer success manager. Webgility labels the tier "Accountant Verified" and sells a separate Full Service Bookkeeping product alongside it.

So Complete is a bookkeeping service delivered on top of the software, not a matching engine you drive yourself. That is a real and useful thing to buy, and at $299 a month it is cheaper than a part-time bookkeeper. It is simply a different purchase from reconciliation software, and the difference shows up in three places: it happens on the accountant's monthly cadence rather than continuously, you cannot inspect or re-run the match yourself, and it covers the ecommerce half of the books, which is what Webgility says on the tab itself: "We take the ecommerce half. Your accountant keeps AP, payroll and sales tax."

What both tools do automatically is the same narrow thing: make a single bank line easier to clear. A2X builds an entry that equals the payout deposit, and Webgility posts the order and fee detail behind it. That is genuinely useful and it is the hardest line on an ecommerce bank statement. It is also one line among many.

Open the actual statement and count what is left. ACH batches to suppliers, wires, transfers between your own accounts, corporate card spend, loan payments, payroll, refunds processed outside the storefront, bank fees. None of it came through a sales channel, so neither tool has any view on it. That gap is not a flaw in either product, it is the boundary of the category. Sellers whose bank only issues PDF statements often start by converting the statement into a spreadsheet just to see the scale of what is left over, which is usually the moment the reconciliation question becomes concrete.

Proving that a populated ledger agrees with the bank, the cards and the processors, line by line and with a reason attached to every match, is a different category of software. It reads both sides read-only rather than writing to either. If your payouts already post correctly and month end still takes a week, that is the purchase you are actually looking for, and no amount of better payout posting will substitute for it.

Which should an ecommerce seller pick?

Answer first: choose A2X if you sell on one or two channels, want summarized entries your accountant can close fast, or run NetSuite. Choose Webgility if you sell on three or more channels, run QuickBooks Enterprise or the Intuit Enterprise Suite, sell through WooCommerce, need inventory and pricing to sync rather than just the accounting, or want the monthly reconciliation done for you on the Complete tier.

Two questions settle it faster than any feature list. First, how many channels will you be running twelve months from now, not today, because that is the number A2X bills against. Second, who reads the ledger? An outside accountant nearly always prefers A2X's summaries. An owner doing margin analysis inside QuickBooks usually wants the order-level detail Webgility preserves.

Then price the real month. Take your busiest month of the last year, count orders per channel, and run it through both ladders including A2X's per-channel stacking and Webgility's overage rates. The gap between the two is frequently the opposite of what the headline prices suggest, and it is a ten minute exercise that decides a multi-year subscription.

Whichever you choose, treat it as the sales side of the problem only. Getting orders into the books correctly and proving the books agree with the bank are two different jobs, and buying well on the first one does not close the second. If you are weighing tools for the second job, the ecommerce payment reconciliation comparison covers what each option actually matches, and the A2X alternatives breakdown goes deeper on where A2X's per-channel pricing lands for multichannel sellers. Webgility pricing and alternatives gets the same treatment, including the separate QuickBooks Enterprise ladder.